Last Sunday Andrew Neather, a former speech writer for a number of British Labour big shots, dropped a bombshell, that by rights should explode over the heads of any and all EUnion socialists: Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser.
The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.It is a truly shocking revelation. Mass immigration was used to irreparably change the face of Great Britain, not for economic necessity, but from an ideological desire to destroy a national identity. And because New Labour knew deep down this wouldn't go over well with their British constituency they engaged in a subterfuge, actively betraying those that had entrusted New Labour with government.
He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".
For the first time in history there is evidence that a government has actually been electing a new people. Millions have come in, straight into a life of low-earning jobs and government benefits, virtually ensuring a solid New Labour constituency replacing the old (out-moded?) one.
At the same time it raises questions about mass-immigration into other EUnion member states. How much of this was actively promoted by the EUnion? How much of this is laid down in Directives? How much of our MPs protestations about getting tough on immigration is that much sound and and fury?
This is probably why the EUnion media outside Britain stays mute on the subject. Any reporting in the issue will undoubtedly lead to questions such as the ones I just posed. The legitimacy of the EUnion is already at an all time low after the forced Irish double referendum. Tolerance of anything EUnion is waning day by day. Uncomfortable answers to inconvenient questions might break the EUnion definitely. Or force it to come out with its benign mask fallen away too soon.
In the mean time Melanie Phillips wrote a searing condemnation in reaction to this revelation:
But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was to destroy Britain's identity and transform it into a multicultural society where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country's.We've had Lisbon. We have immigration. And soon, very soon we will have Copenhagen. After betrayal upon betrayal, angry mobs setting out to kill any politician they can get their hands on will not be far behind, I fear.
h/t to ATW